Threat Risk Assessment – Make Sure to Review This Entire Summary in Regards to This Security Threat Assessment.

Perhaps, you will be unaware but there is a professional research division for future technologies allotted to the usa Government intelligence agencies and industrial intelligence complex. It’s called IARPA in fact it is an ingenious concept based on the DARPA model; High Risk – High Gain strategy to advanced research and development. Which enables sense right, especially considering we live in a world fraught with cyber hackers, corporate espionage, and terrorists. What this means is our intelligence agencies needs to be on your ball, and they should be right 100% of times as the evil-doers simply have to have it right once you find.

Now then, consider in the event you will the massive volume of data our company is collecting on individual citizens nowadays online. Not just that, but everyone has a smart phone, an e-mail address, as well as perhaps a number of social network sites pages. Folks also make comments on articles they read within the media into little boxes and press the submit button. As it is quite easy to determine who someone is dependant on their ISP address, their social network sites profile, their cell phone number, and how they write – it is rather very easy to do security threat assessment to find out if they might be a threat risk.

Today, the artificial intelligent computers which collect all this data have not been optimized or programmed all that well, and thus they can be flagging quite a few false positives. However each time somebody gets away having a crime against humanity, a terrorist act, a hacking event, a criminal act, and even spying the authorities can go back and look at their types of operation, their writings, and gain clues to the human psyche that goes in addition to such folks. And each and every time the artificial intelligent computers improve at guesstimating inside a close tolerance of probability the kind of individuals they are seeking – the more effective they will work. If you are IARPA wouldn’t you be looking into this?

Okay so, as this has all but occurring quite quite a long time it makes sense that these particular artificial intelligent computers are getting rather great at the Lone Wolf assessment (Lone Wolf could be someone like the Unabomber as an example). Consider the lone wolf as being the hardest form of terrorist to discover, somebody who works alone, has very little communication using the rest of the world, detailed plans that are never shared with anyone, and thus few clues to offer them, or few associates, Facebook friends, or collaborators to transform them in. Therefore it is very difficult to get into their brains and discover what they’re thinking without contacting them under the auspice of some important reason other than the exact surveillance.

To put it differently it will take manpower, and a very good story to even get to a degree to speak to this kind of individual. However because everybody is connected now and everybody has the ability to be geo-tracked, and possesses an e-mail address, or even a Facebook page there are numerous methods to speak to they. A possible problem with this is manpower. Therefore it’s obvious that in the foreseeable future artificial intelligent computers, true artificial intelligence as per Alan Turing’s famous AI test (the power of the computer to fool a human into thinking that it must be actually conversing with another human) – will contact these people and begin up some sort of conversation.

The easiest method to do this can be for that artificial intelligent computer to search through each of the data, including all the writings that could have been posted in forums, in response to online media articles, as well as the postings on blogs, and social networking pages. After that the artificial intelligent computer can make use of the individual’s own words, and modify those sentences using similar words with the exact same meaning from the thesaurus, throughout the database from the AI software program – and also this AI computer can speak to the person on the one-on-one basis.

In doing so, the AI computer will be gathering information from that conversation together with anything that the patient types way back in an e-mail. All of that can then be loaded in to a database and included with all of the collected words already written, or spoken into a cellular phone, given that the intelligence agencies have received the right to listen in. Naturally, every one of the public information is not going to need to have a permission slip or court subpoena. It can be quite entirely possible that eventually these AI systems will be able to correspond together with the individual from time to time, checking in on their psychological displacement, or progress, further assessing when they have increased the potential likelihood of committing a violent act, or maybe that individual will be downgraded to an alternative level.

As soon as the individual reaches top of the level, and it appears that these are either willing or ready to commit this kind of act, that’s when human intervention can take place, and only should they become a threat to society or our government in a strong probability, mathematically speaking. With time better algorithms will likely be used and thru practice better techniques is going to be learned to make certain there are actually very few false positives. Now then, I could hear the EFF – Electronic Freedom Foundation already to submit a lawsuit against the use of these AI computers in connection with this.

Maybe the ethical question is going to be does government entities and our intelligence agencies have the authority to snoop on citizens, pretend to be someone they are certainly not, collect information regarding each potential individual, and stick that in a file somewhere, or tucked away in many giant data center? To be honest that in case someone posts information online inside the public, that information is now in the public, and anyone may apply it for any legitimate purpose.

Protecting the American people is within the world of the government’s responsibility as per the United states Constitution and a legitimate purpose you can argue prior to the Supreme Court. Thus, they could have the legal right to gather all of the public information about any individual which happens to be on the net. Not simply will they generally do this for American citizens, and also from potential threats of international terrorism, and people outside our country. Surely, our intelligence services and agencies will be dealing with other governments world wide sharing this information.

Who may be to express that other governments will not be already collecting info on Americans? It could behoove them to accomplish this even when they didn’t find any Americans were a threat to their countries or nations, to the simple reason to sell us more of their products and services that have been imported to the us. Corporations collect your details constantly because maybe you are a customer, you may have joined their rewards program, or else you have been identified as somebody that may potentially purchase something from them in the future. They do have the authority to collect information they find online.

Let’s say somebody who is upset with something occurring on the planet writes rather disparaging comments about some agency, company, industry, or individual about the Washington Post website after a write-up they just read – that information is going to be collected, and therefore the AI computer may contact that individual under false pretense, and attempt to set up a conversation. If it conversation leads the AI computer to think how the individual is problematic, psychotic, extremely angry, or ready to take action into their own hands, then this threat assessment level will go up, and warning signs will probably be raised.

Remember, I used to be discussing the challenges of manpower from the intelligence industry and intelligence agencies. This really is a real dilemma, for once we have lots of false positives and spend too much time and funds on the wrong individuals, we are liable to let other people slip through. However, in the event the artificial intelligent computer has gotten seccurity the purpose it might pass the Turing test without tipping off of the individual, it might in simple terms have conversations by e-mail with tens of thousands of people in one afternoon.

Since this could be possible or perhaps, already is, it will likely be element of our future, our government, as well as other governments, and people will make use of these techniques, every one of them plus some more I have not discussed in this particular article. Okay so, I suppose you are wondering the reason I understand this? No comment. Indeed, I am hoping you’ve enjoyed today’s technology briefing and savor the rest of your afternoon, I realize I will, and don’t forget to put more info about you online at your social media. Ha ha ha. Please consider all of this and think into it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *